Audio recordings in the workplace: What’s legal?

empty cubicles in an office

In an age where conversations are routinely captured—whether on smartphones, surveillance systems, or video calls—it’s no surprise that questions around the legality of audio recordings in the workplace are growing louder. Can your boss record a team meeting without telling you? Can you record a conversation with HR just in case, and how do you stay on the right side of the law when privacy, accountability, and technology are all in the mix?


Why do people record at work?

People record for all kinds of reasons. Sometimes it’s for transparency—to have a record of what was said in a heated meeting or to clarify expectations from a client call. Other times, it’s more about protection. Whistleblowers might need proof. Employees navigating disputes may feel safer with recordings. And employers? They might want to deter inappropriate behavior or collect evidence of misconduct.

Surveillance is also a huge piece of this puzzle. Think CCTV, security footage, even audio-enabled systems on premises—especially in industries like law enforcement, retail, or healthcare. In these environments, video privacy solutions made simple are more than a convenience—they’re a legal necessity.

So yes, there are valid reasons to hit record. But legality hinges on context—particularly who’s doing the recording and where.


Ensure compliance with secure audio redaction.


Federal law on audio recording

At the federal level in the United States, the law is fairly straightforward. Under the Wiretap Act (Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968), it is illegal to record an oral, telephonic, or electronic communication unless at least one party consents. This is called “one-party consent.”

Translation? If you’re part of the conversation, you can record it—federally speaking—without needing to tell the other party. But there’s a catch: state laws can complicate this, and many do.

Also worth noting: secret recordings can still backfire in civil cases or violate internal policies, even if technically legal.


State laws on workplace recording

While most U.S. states follow one-party consent rules, 11 states require all-party consent—meaning everyone involved in the conversation has to agree to the recording.

These states include California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington. So, for example, if you’re in California and want to record a chat with your manager? You’ll need their permission. If you record without it, you could face civil penalties or even criminal charges.

And when it comes to remote workers? Things can get legally fuzzy. If participants are in different states, you may need to comply with the strictest applicable law—especially if you want the recording to hold up in court.


Can employers record conversations?

man with hand on his ear eavesdropping

In general, employers can record workplace conversations—but only under certain conditions.

If the recording happens in a public area of the workplace (like a reception desk or open-plan office), and it’s done for legitimate business reasons, it’s often permitted—especially when employees are made aware.

But audio recording in private areas—think break rooms, restrooms, or personal offices—can easily cross legal and ethical lines, even if you're a business owner.

Here’s where platforms like Secure Redact step in. By automating the detection for redaction of names, dates, and other PII (personally identifiable information) in audio and video, tools like this allow employers to maintain safety, transparency, and compliance—without compromising privacy.

It’s also worth noting that some industries (such as law enforcement) may be required to record for accountability—just as they may be required to redact before sharing or storing.


Can employees record conversations?

If you’re an employee thinking of recording a meeting or conversation at work—especially without telling the other party—proceed with caution.

In a one-party consent state, it might be legal. But if you’re in a two-party consent state and don’t get permission, that recording could open you up to lawsuits (even if it contains something incriminating). Beyond legality, think of how the recording might be received. Will it damage trust with your employer? Could it be considered a breach of policy?

That said, if you feel unsafe or are experiencing discrimination, harassment, or retaliation, it may be worth seeking legal advice. Some whistleblower laws provide protection if you're recording to expose illegal activity, but it's a fine line—and not a blanket shield.


Workplace policies on recording

Regardless of what the law says, many organizations have their own internal policies around audio and video recording. These policies ma y:

  • Require consent from all parties before any recording

  • Prohibit personal recordings of meetings or conversations

  • Mandate the use of approved platforms for company calls (especially ones that log or secure recordings)

  • Outline disciplinary actions for unauthorized recordings

Employers should be crystal clear about what is and isn’t allowed—and ideally, those expectations should be included in onboarding materials, employee handbooks, and compliance training.

As privacy regulations become stricter, companies also need to be proactive in managing the data they collect. Audio is data. And if it includes personal or sensitive details? It’s subject to privacy laws like GDPR, HIPAA, and others—especially if that content is stored or shared.

Want to learn more about keeping your recordings compliant? This guide to redacting audio from video walks through the steps to protect privacy and avoid data violations—whether you’re redacting for internal use or sharing with outside agencies.


Final thoughts

What’s legal when it comes to recording audio in the workplace? It depends on federal and state laws, yes. But also on who’s doing the recording, why they’re doing it, and whether the people involved have consented. The line between security and surveillance is a thin one, and crossing it (even unintentionally) can come at a high cost.

For businesses, it’s smart to be proactive. That means clear policies, smart tech, and tools that make compliance easier rather than harder. You don’t have to navigate redaction manually. Platforms like Secure Redact use AI to identify and redact names, dates, locations, and other PII—so your recordings can do their job, without becoming a liability.


Protect privacy in every frame with smart redaction.

Previous
Previous

Data Minimization: Everything you need to know

Next
Next

Data redaction vs data masking: What’s the difference?